Cash balance plans offer large tax deductions, but they can be complex. There’s a lot of terminology that you must understand for your plan to be successful.
One important area where we see some confusion is when clients discuss “pay credits” and “contribution” amounts. There is an assumption that they are the same thing. But this is incorrect.
In this article, we will discuss these terms and explain how the plan works. Let’s get started.
Pay credit and contribution are different numbers
In a cash balance plan, the pay credit is a promised pension accrual for the year. It is the benefit the employer owes the participant under the plan formula. The contribution is the cash the employer deposits to support that promise.
Think of the pay credit as the benefit invoice for the year. Think of the contribution as the cash needed to keep the plan financially on track. Those numbers often move in different directions.
A pay credit is usually stated as a percent of pay or a flat dollar amount. It is credited to a participant’s hypothetical account for the plan year. The plan also credits an interest credit under the plan’s terms.
The contribution is driven by funding rules and actuarial measurements. It reflects assets already in the plan investment account and amounts owed to employees. It can be higher or lower than the pay credit in the same year.
Many business owners hear a pay credit and assume it is the contribution. That shortcut creates confusion during strong or weak market periods. A cash balance plan does not work like a defined contribution plan.
Investments and interest credits drive what you must contribute
The plan maintains investments that can go up or down each year. Those investment results affect how much cash the employer must contribute. The pay credit formula will usually remain steady while contributions swing.
If the investment account earned strong returns, existing assets may cover more liability. In that case, the required contribution may be smaller than the pay credit. The plan still owes the pay credit, but assets already did the heavy lifting.
If the investment account had poor returns, assets may no longer match the promised benefit. The employer may need larger contributions to restore the funded position. That extra cash is not a new pay credit.
Interest credits also matter, even when investments are conservative. Participants earn an interest credit defined by the plan document. The funding target reflects both pay credits and those interest credits.
This is why two identical pay credits can produce different contributions. One plan might be ahead of target, and the other might be behind. The actuary’s job is to quantify that difference each year.
Cash balance plans are permanent, and funding is year-to-year
A cash balance plan is designed as an ongoing defined benefit plan. It is not intended to be turned on and off like a short-term tactic. Decisions made this year change the math for future years.
Use EMPARION PLANS on
*Emparion is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by these institutions.*
When you contribute, you are not only paying for one year’s pay credit. You are also shaping the plan’s funded status for later plan years. Funding extra today can reduce the need to fund tomorrow.
Actuarial calculations are performed on a year-to-year basis. Each valuation starts with last year’s ending assets and liabilities. Then it layers in pay credits, interest credits, and experience gains or losses.
If you change the investment allocation, future contributions can change. If payroll changes, pay credits can change for covered employees. If interest crediting changes, liabilities can change even faster.
Because the plan is permanent, a contribution is never isolated. It becomes part of the pool of trust assets supporting all accrued benefits. That is why actuarial valuation is a rolling process.
IRS funding rules allow contributions above the current year pay credit
The IRS prefers defined benefit plans to avoid underfunding. Funding shortfalls create administrative burden and participant risk. So the rules allow meaningful prefunding within limits.
A company can contribute more than the needed amount. It will often be substantially higher than the pay credit for the year. This is often where owners see the biggest planning opportunity.
One common concept is funding above the minimum required amount. The IRS does not like underfunded defined benefit plans. So it allows a contribution up to well above the annual accrual.
Is a Cash Balance or Defined Benefit Plan Right For You?
A practical framing is this: the pay credit is what is earned this year. The deductible funding range can be wider than that yearly accrual. That extra funding can carry forward as a funding cushion.
When you fund above target, the excess generally rolls into the next year. That typically reduces the employer’s required funding in a later valuation. It can also buffer the plan after a down market year.
| Concept | What it represents | What changes it most | How it affects next year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pay credit | Annual benefit promised under the formula | Compensation and the pay credit percentage | Becomes part of accrued liability |
| Interest credit | Growth credited to the hypothetical account | Plan’s interest crediting rate or index | Increases liabilities even without new pay credits |
| Target contribution | Contribution needed to stay near the plan’s funding target | Asset performance, assumptions, and prior year funded status | Can smooth future funding if consistently met |
| Minimum required contribution | Lowest amount required to satisfy funding rules for the year | Funding shortfalls, credit balances, and required amortization payments | Underfunding can increase future minimums and restrictions |
| Maximum deductible contribution | Upper contribution limit generally allowed as a deduction | IRS deduction limits, funding range, and participant accrued benefits | Excess can create a cushion that lowers later required deposits |
| Prefunding / surplus | Contributing above target to build a funding cushion | Employer cash flow and deduction planning | Often reduces future required contributions after losses |
| Funding shortfall | Assets below the plan’s funding target | Market declines and prior underfunding | Typically increases future required contributions and minimums |
Why they seem the same in solo plans, and why that can mislead
In many solo cash balance plans, the owner targets the same annual deposit. They often fund near the plan’s target each year for simplicity. That behavior can make pay credit and contribution look identical.
When a plan is consistently funded at target, the mismatch is less visible. Stable returns and conservative allocations can reduce year-to-year swings. Owners then start using the two terms as if they are interchangeable.
Once returns differ from expectations, the gap becomes obvious. A strong year can reduce the next required deposit below the pay credit. A weak year can force a deposit well above the pay credit.
In employee plans, the confusion can be more costly. Owners may budget pay credit dollars and underestimate required cash. They may also miss chances to prefund when cash flow is strong.
Here are planning reminders that keep the terms straight:
- Pay credit is a benefit accrual, not a funding requirement.
- Contributions respond to funded status, which includes prior years.
- Strong returns can lower required contributions without lowering pay credits.
- Poor returns can raise required contributions without increasing pay credits. Prefunding can create a cushion that reduces later required deposits.
- Year-to-year actuarial work ties everything together for the long run.
Bottom Line
A cash balance plan pay credit tells you what the plan promises for the year. It does not tell you the exact cash deposit required for that year. The contribution depends on invested assets, cumulative employee liabilities, and experience from prior years.
Investment performance can make contributions smaller or larger than pay credits. Interest credits and cumulative accruals also change the funding target. That is why actuarial valuations must be performed annually and consistently.
The clearest takeaway is to separate benefit design from funding mechanics. Pay credits define what participants earn under the plan document. Contributions are the financial strategy used to keep the promise funded.
